- HAPPY NEW YEAR = ANYONE ELSE WANT A SIMPLE METHOD FOR ORGANIZING DOCUMENTS [2 Updates]
- [No Subject] [1 Update]
- Becoming a Creditor: Window of opportunity will close: Meaning??? [2 Updates]
- Colorado's Ultimate Ski Bum Jailed [1 Update]
- CHRISTIAN WALTERS LINK 7PM ET SAT [1 Update]
- Wanted AFV success stories to be shared [1 Update]
- Jurisdiction Question [2 Updates]
- 1099-OID scams getting shut down by IRS [2 Updates]
- Return To Sender [1 Update]
- Rejection of Fiduciary Appointment [1 Update]
- Lowering Credit Limit [1 Update]
- You can a4v your BC but can you a4v your SScard and gain more control over Cestui Que Trust [1 Update]
Topic: HAPPY NEW YEAR = ANYONE ELSE WANT A SIMPLE METHOD FOR ORGANIZING DOCUMENTS
- Berticus
On Dec 31 2009, 6:47 pm, "Bruce Meyers"
wrote:
- PopPopCraig
Hello Bruce,
I am one ot those who did not receive your "Simple Way To Organize
Documents." I would really appreciate your trying to send it again.
THANKS,
Craig
On Dec 31 2009, 6:47 pm, "Bruce Meyers"
wrote:
Topic: [No Subject]
- jorgecure thomas
Does anyone know how long it takes after you A4V the docs to the IRS does it take for them to contact the individual you A4V"ed, and pay them off? lets say your "local property tax collector"
Topic: Becoming a Creditor: Window of opportunity will close: Meaning???
- Manji
I am listening to an audio of Jack Smith at a retreat in Cleveland,
2009 November, 11th. In the retreat, workshop, seminar, whatever you
wanna call it, he said:
"I believe we've go three years to turn yourself around and become a
creditor, rather than a debtor. Because if you don't your window of
opportunity will close."
Why would that happen?
I have my own imagination as why that would happen but, I would like
hear everyone else's thoughts one why they think that would happen.
Why would the window of opportunity to become a creditor would be
closing somewhere in the near future say, 1-5 years. Jack put the
window to close at 2012 or at least around that time.
Do you even think the window of opportunity is even gonna close at
all?
Jack also talked about a situation where "they" are gonna come to our
homes and tell us that they gotta take our homes and put us somewhere.
How might that happen?
Well, I have my own imagination as to how that might happen and if you
interested, please free to ask. I'd be more than happy to share. But,
I would like to hear everyone's thoughts about what Jack is talking
about.
Well, I wish everyone love and safety.
Damean
Loving Kindness
- Max Hemmingway
> Why would the window of opportunity to become a creditor would be
> closing somewhere in the near future say, 1-5 years. Jack put the
> window to close at 2012 or at least around that time.
Strange. The ancient Mayan calendar predicted that the world would
come to an end in December 2012. Nostradamus also predicted the end of
the world in 2012. Several other studies and prophets have also
predicted the end of the world in 2012. None of them seem to have any
idea of how that is going to happen but there are no end of such
predictions
Could he have been reading the Mayan Calendar or Nostradamus?
> Do you even think the window of opportunity is even gonna close at
> all?
We will all just have to wait and see, won't we?
> Jack also talked about a situation where "they" are gonna come to our
> homes and tell us that they gotta take our homes and put us somewhere.
> How might that happen?
If "they" were to do that then there would be no consumers to buy
their goods and services and "they" would all go broke in a big hurry
trying to support us. Even genocide such as Hitler tried costs a lot
of money and was what actually ruined Germany's economy more than
anything else. Had he put all those people to work instead of killing
them he might have had a vibrant economy. Instead he killed off his
work force and wasted Germany's resources in a useless war. I doubt
"they" will be so stupid as to do anything like that.
Topic: Colorado's Ultimate Ski Bum Jailed
- mountainmark
This poor guy has been in a Georgetown,Colo jail for 57 days now for
simply sleeping in his car at the ski resort. He faces 2 years in
federal prison and $250,000 in fines. This guy's a land lubber skier
out to hurt no one, and has no clue that his vessel in commerce has
just been boarded by maritime pirates out for profit and booty! Any
ideas on how to mount a defense or get this guy out (out to where I'm
not sure)? BC and A4V the charges? Plead guilty and pay fine with
pre-paid exemption? GSA forms? Ideas are needed! Thanks!
http://www.9news.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=130495&catid=222
Topic: CHRISTIAN WALTERS LINK 7PM ET SAT
- John Ingress
I believe he points to one success, which he discusses briefly in the
attached doc, "Creating trusts". It's what started him down this road.
They were in court trying to stop a foreclosure, and they got it
postponed. Here's what he says:
. A practical example; a mortgage foreclosure case, where foreclosure
sale was set before any documents had been filed, and the documents
were prepared that expressed the trust in three lines and a footnote
and case cites. The court construed the trust and appointed the
trustee as defendant. Our “Notice of Interest” (a statement that we
are expressing the trust), alleged that the defendant was the
beneficiary now, not the trustee, as the court had construed. The sale
was postponed two hours before it was set to go.
We determined that the reasons for the postponement were 1) any time
the trustee and the beneficiary are one and the same, the trust
freezes, or terminates. The court construed or implied the trustee to
be the defendant, where we came in and expressed the trustee to be the
beneficiary, freezing the trust.
2) More importantly, we filed the SOI, Statement of Interest, and that
has to be filed within 30 days of claiming the NOI, because the NOI
times out. This gives the court notice of a claim, so it could not
give free and clear title with a notice of adverse claim
SOI supports the fact that we are the grantor and the beneficiary.
That case collapsed, disappeared. (The SOI is CCI, Confidential
Commercial Information).
[the other two doc's I just finished, for your enjoyment. As always,
they are not verbatim, so, prima facia, can nay be construed as legal
advice] P,S. ResisTyr, you are IN the pool, in the DEEP END, hopefully
this is your/our lifeline.
Topic: Wanted AFV success stories to be shared
- Loving the truth
Congrats.... glad to hear good news.
Topic: Jurisdiction Question
- jman636
Hi All,
A quick question regarding jurisdiction with commercial processes. As
indicated in the various classes, the public is "Disneyland" - an
illusion where nothing works as it should; the land of color and
nobility (inequity). Further, Jack or Brandon mention in one of the
recent conferences that an Affidavit in the public is heresay...
however in the private it carries full weight.
So the question is: can a process perfected in/from the public be
enforced as readily as one in/from the private? It would make sense
given the background above that a public process could not be as
readily enforced (in this case I refer to enforcement as the execution
of a commercial lien). In what cases would one be better than the
other? Certainly the IRS and others are able to perfect processes in
the public - since obviously it's all contract. But if Affidavits in
public are heresay, how could they ever create a solid foundation for
a lien?
Would love to hear from someone who has perfected a public or private
process and executed a lien. I'm preparing to do my 1st.
Namaste
- Eli Lilly
An affidavit is hearsay, if not recorded in the public, not dishonored, and not sworn by a public official such as a notary. Everything can be considered hearsay if its not given by the individual who has first hand knowledge. Ive rarely seen private processes work, but to each its on. Just make sure if you make a claim against the treasury/us that it be congruent with the Federal Claims Act.
Subject: Jurisdiction Question
Hi All,
A quick question regarding jurisdiction with commercial processes. As
indicated in the various classes, the public is "Disneyland" - an
illusion where nothing works as it should; the land of color and
nobility (inequity). Further, Jack or Brandon mention in one of the
recent conferences that an Affidavit in the public is heresay...
however in the private it carries full weight.
So the question is: can a process perfected in/from the public be
enforced as readily as one in/from the private? It would make sense
given the background above that a public process could not be as
readily enforced (in this case I refer to enforcement as the execution
of a commercial lien). In what cases would one be better than the
other? Certainly the IRS and others are able to perfect processes in
the public - since obviously it's all contract. But if Affidavits in
public are heresay, how could they ever create a solid foundation for
a lien?
Would love to hear from someone who has perfected a public or private
process and executed a lien. I'm preparing to do my 1st.
Namaste
Topic: 1099-OID scams getting shut down by IRS
- Jason A
He meant the "dolts" are the people that are jumping into OID
processes without knowing exactly what they're doing and how to handle
themselves.
- Max Hemmingway
. A "dolt" position is
> not a fun one to be in. We spear headed the process and now this is
> the thanks we are getting.
You say "we spear headed the process" but that definitely begs the
question of "Who gets the shaft?" Every spear has a shaft so who gets
the shaft in this one? The answer is, of course, those who blindly
follow the spearhead without doing any of their own research to find
out how valid the thinking might be or what the consequences might
be.
Everyone languishing in Club Fed got in that position because they did
the same thing. They failed to think. They failed to reason and they
failed to do their own research. They blindly followed some spearhead
and ened up getting the shaft.
http://www.mysexydevices.com
http://docs.google.com/?pli=1#all
http://tinyurl.com/ybevmte ------>Creditors-in-commerce links page
http://sites.google.com/site/cap1sucks/
(302) 360-8448
Topic: Return To Sender
- Richard
Can anyone offer text they have successfully used regarding "Return To
Sender" when one does not what to contract with the Sender? I presume
RETURN TO SENDER would be written on the envelope, what if anything is
written on the offer? Thanks for the help.
- jman636
I really don't know where you are coming from on all of this and am
trying to understand the situation here. You realize of course that
the president of your HOA can't cash in that A4V anymore than you can.
Knowing this, aren't you dishonoring the original contract (I assume
there was one)? The reason we use judges, CFOs, IRS and the like is
because most of these people know exactly what to do with A4Vs. Put
yourself in the shoes of this guy. Has he not taken responsibility to
collect and appropriate funds for the betterment of the community? Did
you not agree to this at some point? How exactly do you feel justified
in dishonoring this/these individual(s)? Do you believe these
technologies are intented for us to all run around being irresponsible
and derelict in our duty to the communities in which we live? Forgive
me because I don't know the story here - I'm just going on the
information I have. Please help us understand what this is about. It
sounds like you are trying to perfect a process on someone who trying
to honor his responsibilities to the community... and from his
perspective you just gave him a bag of dirt and a xerox'd $500
Monopoly bill. Imagine when it's payday (assuming you work and receive
a paycheck) your boss came up to you and said "here's your paycheck...
it's an A4V... have a nice day. If you don't like it, argue and I'll
lien you up". Is that who we are?
Namaste.
Topic: Lowering Credit Limit
- Jason A
The lowering can be done because your acceptance of the card terms
permitted them to do it. It's in there, I've looked. But I would say
yes, you can always conditionally accept changes in the contract. It
may not do any good unless you find some way to enforce it though.
Topic: You can a4v your BC but can you a4v your SScard and gain more control over Cestui Que Trust
- Natty
Greetings All,
I was thinking that maybe a4ving the sscard will give you more control
over the cestui que account and make the reality of getting every a4v
approved increase. Is this possible? Anyone try it? Maybe you can do a
bond with it like the BC but just change the numbers etc?
Peace,
Isatu
http://docs.google.com/?pli=1#all
http://tinyurl.com/ybevmte ------>Creditors-in-commerce links page
http://sites.google.com/site/cap1sucks/
(302) 360-8448
No comments:
Post a Comment